Get the most out of your OKRs by using Tana

Basics of OKRs
What are OKRs?
OKR stands for âObjectives and Key Resultsâ â a management methodology invented by Andy Grove at Intel in the 1970s and popularized by John Doerr through is book âMeasure what Mattersâ in which he tells the stories of how OKRs helped organizations like Google to become the dominant players that they are today.
The idea behind OKRs is to align everyone in an organization to work towards the same goal and prevent ârandom workâ that looks and feels productive but does not contribute to achieving a companyâs or teamâs mission.
If you want to test using OKRs in Tana, check out the OKR template.
Benefits of OKRs for High-Expectation Leaders
Why use OKRs? Whatâs the benefit of adopting this approach?
What makes OKRs great is that they allow you to create focus and alignment in your organization. They also give you a way to really show and elicit commitment to the work being done, as well as tracking what everyone is working on, what their highest impact areas are, and providing an incentive for stretching what everyone is trying to do.
When OKRs Might Not Be the Best Fit
OKRs arenât a silver bullet that will deliver exceptional results in every single circumstance:
Clue 1: Insufficient buy-in
As with any process or tool that youâre introducing to your team or wider organization, youâll need sufficient buy-in so that people take it seriously and actually do whatâs required to make it work. Thereâs no fix for half-hearted attempts to write OKRs, or using other tools for that matter.
Clue 2: Fitting OKRs in project management
One common question is âwhat is OKR in project managementâ â and the answer is that OKRs arenât the right tool for project management in the first place. Why is that? The idea behind OKRs is to set, communicate and monitor organizational goals in regular intervals. In essence, OKRs generate projects (called âinitiativesâ in this context) with the purpose of achieving a specific key result. But you would not generate OKRs within a project or initiative.
Clue 3: OKRs for measuring continuous indicators
Another common question is what the difference between OKRs and KPIs is. In short, OKRs are actionable, ambitious and time-bound â whereas KPIs are continuous indicators for the ongoing performance of a particular function or process. KPIs ask the question âhow are we doing?â while OKRs ask âwhat do we want to achieve and how do we get there?â
Clue 4: OKRs for performance reviews
Finally, OKRs arenât the best fit when you are looking for a tool to feed performance reviews of your team. For a time it was common to set OKRs not just on the organizational level but to create objectives and key results for every individual team member. This turned out to be not a good idea, because it turned key results more into task lists than into ambitious targets that would inspire exceptional performance.
One key idea for OKRs in general is to make them so ambitious that you achieve them only 70% of the time â which in turn means you and your team can work really, really hard and still not âsucceedâ. But thatâs by design and should not negatively impact the performance review. Because if it does, it will lead to one thing: the next rounds of key results will be made more and more conservative until 100% success is always achieved, snuffing out any ambition and making OKRs virtually useless.
OKR prep and planning
How to write a good OKR
The key to writing good objectives and key results is to make them actionable, ambitious and time-bound. What does that look like?
OKRs are about alignment across all levels
Before we dive into the specifics of writing good objectives and good key results, remember that the idea behind OKRs is to align everyone in what they are working towards, achieving the company vision and mission. Good OKRs make it clear to everyone involved how their work contributes to this, and every team and team member can track their work all the way up the chain to the goals of the company.
3 to 5 OKRs per team â not more
Another important question is âhow many OKRs should a team have?â and the anwer is: about three to five. Anything more than that diffuses your energy too much and becomes hard to actually make progress on.
How to write good Objectives
Objectives are for the âWhatâ
A good objective gives the âwhatâ and does so in a tangible and unambiguous way. When you write your objectives, one good question to ask yourself is âCould a competent outsider come in at the end and judge whether this has been accomplished or not?â
Go for ambition AND realism
In addition, make sure that your objectives are ambitious and realistic at the same time. This can take a bit of practice to get right. There is a natural tension between being ambitious and realistic and it is fine to occasionally have objectives that have to be met with 100% certainty.
Choose between âcommittedâ and âaspirationalâ OKRs
Some organizations therefore distinguish between âcommittedâ and âaspirationalâ OKRs. Committed OKRs will be hit, even if that means adjusting the schedule or increasing the available resources substantially. Aspirational OKRs on the other hand will get hit only with 70% certainty â most will be met, but thereâs high variance between them over time.
Now whatâs a good objective look like compared to a bad one?
Hereâs a bad objective: âMake our company the best place to workâ
Sure, this is aspirational, but itâs too vague to be useful. A better objective would be âBecome recognized as a leader in employee satisfaction and retentionâ â still aspirational, but much more concrete in that weâre explicitly focusing on âemployee satisfactionâ and âretention.â Note that weâre not specifying more than that though: weâre giving direction without fixating on a specific metric. Thatâs what weâll do in the Key Results section.
Letâs look at another example: âImprove our social media presenceâ
Again aspirational, but again too vague. Better: âSignificantly expand our engagement and reach on social media to drive customer acquisitionâ. Weâre giving direction, weâre aspirational, and weâre also connecting the objective to a larger Why. This is important both for overall alignment and for motivation.
Once you have a âwhatâ, the question is how you get it, and thatâs when you start designing your Key Results.
If you want some help in reviewing your OKRs, test the OKR AI agent in the OKR template.
Designing Measurable Key Results
Key Results are quantifiable
The defining characteristic of key results is that they are quantifiable. What does that mean?
Letâs look at our example objective from above: âBecome recognized as a leader in employee satisfaction and retention.â How do you quantify this?
From the objective we have three hints that we now need to operationalize.
- âBecome recognized as a leaderâ
- employee satisfaction
- retention
What does âbecome recognized as a leaderâ mean precisely? Maybe thereâs an industry association that surveys and recognizes the top 10 âbest places to workâ in the industry.
A first key result for our objective could then be âGet included in SurveyCorpâs âTop 10 Places to Workâ listâ.
Beware of âlagging indicatorsâ
The problem is that being included in this list is whatâs called a âlagging indicatorâ that we only have limited control over. Being on the list is a result of actions weâre taking, and whether we actually get included is out of our hands. Instead, when writing your key results, focus on writing concrete âleading indicatorsâ, things that you have more direct control over.
Better key results would look like this:
- KR1: Increase average employee satisfaction by 8%
- KR2: Increase employee retention rate from 90% to 95%
Choose âoutcome key resultsâ over âinput key resultsâ
Now, you could quibble here and say âwell, employee satisfaction is a lagging indicator too!â â and youâd be right. It is, however, a lagging indicator that you can directly influence. This is an âoutcome key resultâ and these can be really useful in allowing a team to dynamically come up with the best solutions for achieving them. One of the most common pitfalls of OKRs is actually focusing on âinput key resultsâ that read more like concrete task lists that don't allow dynamic adjustment during the work.
Calibrate for a 70% success rate
As mentioned previously, ambition in setting objectives and key results is one of the key factors for getting the most out of them. But calibrating ambition is a skill that needs to be developed by everyone responsible for setting OKRs. A general rule of thumb for calibration is that you want to succeed (achieve your key results) around 70% of the time. If you succeed more than that, you arenât ambitious enough and if you achieve significantly less, youâre overly ambitious.
Implementing OKRs
Prevent âgoal driftâ by having one responsible person per Key Result
When implementing OKRs, one issue that often comes up is that they are hard to connect to the initiatives that are supposed to achieve them. Itâs all too easy to experience goal drift where in the course of making things happen the goal drifts away from what was originally set out in the objectives and key results.
The reason for this is two-fold: one mistake is to not make a single individual responsible for the Key Result â without a directly responsible individual, veering off course is all but guaranteed. The second reason is harder to spot because it depends on the way we work and in particular the reliance on files and folders.
OKRs die in silos â connect them to everything
That sounds like an unusual thing to blame, so letâs zoom in a little. Most often OKRs are written down in a document that is then (occasionally) referenced. This document, however, is not connected to the places where the work happens. That work is happening in code bases, issue trackers, Excel sheets, project management apps and a hundred other places â all separate from the document where the OKRs are written up.
This in turn means that people see the OKRs only when they consult the document, for which they have little reason in the normal course of the work that they are doing. That means that unless someone makes it a habit to pull up the OKR document in every single meeting, itâs likely only consulted in the meetings that are explicitly about the OKRs, or in short: not often enough.
Implementing OKRs with Tana
This is where an app like Tana can fundamentally transform the way we work and get things done. Because in Tana, you can connect your OKRs to the actual work at every level. OKRs are never siloed away in some folder nested in a deep dark place that no-one ever visits. Instead, OKRs can be visibly connected to every single initiative going on, every meeting you hold and stay visible during the work and all the meetings surrounding it.
See every Key Result during every 1:1
Without going into the weeds here, consider the example from above: we have the objective âBecome recognized as a leader in employee satisfaction and retentionâ and we have the key result âIncrease average employee satisfaction by 8%â. Julia is one member of our team that is directly responsible for this key result. If you have a 1:1 with Julia, Tana can pull in every Key Result and its connected Objective automatically â no need to reference some document that you donât know where you saved it exactly.
Every project shows it purpose
We also have a project/initiative âImplement flexible work schedulingâ that is supposed to work towards achieving the key result. In Tana it is trivial to connect this project/initiative to the key result and by extension the objective. That means wherever weâre looking at the project/initiative, we always have the key result in sight, we see who the directly responsible individual for the key result is, and what objective the key result is part of. Our work therefore never experiences goal drift because we always have the overarching objective right in front of us.
Conclusion
OKRs are a powerful tool for organizational focus, alignment, and commitment. Following OKRs prevent aimless work, and are important for ambitious goal-setting. Tana is a practical solution to integrate OKRs seamlessly with your projects, tasks and more.